Answer:
The answer will be rising action
Explanation:
Complication is an obstacle in a story that gets harder to deal with as the story progresses.
Exposition is the insertion of background information.
So therefore the only other answer could be rising action unless the princess being introduced is at the end of the story.
Answer:
D. The runner's records had been broken and people have stopped talking about him.
Explanation:
The above option is correct.
In the stated lines, the author actually meant that the runner's records had actually been broken and people have stopped talking about him. We see this in the line that stated "Runners who renown outran" - this reveals that there are runners that outran the man. So, as a result of that, his record was surpassed and people stopped about him - this we see in the line: "And the name died before the man".
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that the Joe's genuine character has lead the people to like him while <span>Mr. Trabb's pompous "toady" attributes has reverse effect on him.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Answer:
Answer and read what, there is nothing else here.
Explanation:
Conspiracy theories were always irrational ideas without evidence that’s what a “theory” is so if you have proof you have to have the dates, witnesses, because anyone can fake a video or picture with the help of video editing. Though many people use the term debunk to infer that they have falsified an idea, over the years, it has become less rational an endeavor. Today many debunkers are actually pseudo-skeptics. Instead of considering an idea and trying to falsify it, many debunkers just assume science is on their side and instead try to a priori dismiss the idea, and worse to discredit the person who proposes the idea. That is not rational skepticism or critical thinking. Debunking isn’t always falsification or refutation but as often as not just name-calling and denial.
Answer
Since anything can be called a conspiracy theory, and since debunking can be achieved by put-downs and shaming; any idea you don’t like, you call a conspiracy theory and its proponent a conspiracist, and then contemptuously mock the idea and the person who advocates it. Easy-peezy-debunky-sleazy.
88 views
2
Related Questions (More Answers Below)