Answer:
Given this change in the cost, the adequacy and quality of the estimated cost drivers and costs used by the system will determine the costing results for SR6 under the new system.
Explanation:
A cost driver can be described as the unit of an activity or any factor that makes the cost of an activity to fluctuate. An estimated cost driver is adequate and of the expected quality when quality or quantity is satisfactory or acceptable.
Therefore, given this change in the cost, the adequacy and quality of the estimated cost drivers and costs used by the system will determine the costing results for SR6 under the new system.
The answers are supply and demand.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Studies of mutual fund performance indicate that mutual funds that outperformed the market in one time period usually do not beat the market in the next time period.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": perception of social status.
Explanation:
The perception of social status refers to discriminating people by the level of income and lifestyles they have. People with higher buying power are usually seen as smarter and more educated while those with below-average income are usually seen with relative mistrust.
This is a stereotype that leads to having incorrect ideas of how people are. In front of job interviews, all applicants must be evaluated based on their <em>qualifications, skills, </em>and <em>experience</em> rather than on what is the price tag of the clothing they are wearing.
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
