Answer:
Georgia, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on Native American land. Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision helped form the basis for most subsequent law in the United States regarding Native Americans. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.Worcester's decision was important in terms of the Native American rights because he was there to help the Native Americans not be scared of the Supreme Court. That they can fight and stay where they are. In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Marshall, the Court held that the Georgia act, under which Worcester was prosecuted, violated the Constitution, treaties, and laws of the United States.
Explanation:
You mean in practice or in theory? Because with any political party, the outcome is always different.
The Correct Answer Would Be:
~ It was not known whether all states would respond to an attack on one state.
Technology has deeply affected the global economy and its usage has been linked to marketplace transformation, improved living standards and more robust international trade.
