One major difference between Noah’s and Rector’s historical interpretation of the War on Poverty is Noah described poverty as a societal failure rather than personal moral failings.
Explanation:
In the interpretation of the war on poverty Noah and Rector does not possess same thinking. As Noah thought that poverty is a social curse in which one has nothing to do. War is one of the cause of financial crisis that led to poverty in the society. People used to lose their property, money everything in the war.
On the other side Rector do not think that poverty is a social curse. He thought that poverty is caused to anyone due to the failings of one's personal moral values. He thought poverty can be replenished if anyone's want. It has no power to be heavy on one's life.
The court of Appeals is tasked to determine whether or not the law is applied correctly in the trial court. The Appeals courts consist of three judges and don't use a jury. The court of Appeals don't retry cases or hear new evidence but review the procedures and decisions made by the trial court to ensure that the proceedings were fair and proper law was applied correctly.
Answer:
Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, was a powerful king who reunited most of Western Europe through his conquests. He was an able administrator and brought about economic reforms to bring prosperity in his kingdom. Charlemagne is famous for his work towards the development of education like building of schools and standardization of curriculum.
Explanation:
He wanted to restrict the supply in order to raise its price. Farmers were growing too much of their crops and as result demand started to go down.
