I think D is the best answer choice. for a work written around the time of the salem witch trials, you can better understand why extreme fear and condemnation of witchcraft might show up, and the author's purpose is a major thing to understand a work. C doesn't really make sense, because historical context is based on facts, so the context doesn't so much help you understand an author's attitude/opinion. B is true to some degree, but D is still a stronger answer as B is somewhat circular; historical context is an inherent part of a historical character? and A doesn't even make sense to me but i personally would go with D
It all depends on one's confidence and way of expressing themselves. Personally, I would say no. After everything that's been going on in this horrid year of 2020, the BLM movement has reasons. Since society today <em>still</em> has to fight for black lives (as well as others that aren't cis, straight, white men), the Pledge of Allegince speaks lies. Many people may pledge "justice for all," but our actions speak different from our words. If you are safe and have the confidence to rebel for what is just, <em>do not stand</em>, as one with heart shall not stand for injustice.
Hope this helps!
I absolutely love writing stuff like this, and it feels good.
Answer:
LOL WHAT KIND OF QUESTION IS THIS
Answer:
"This is why in conclusion" <em>and</em> "Billy Bud might have shown a great similarity between..." "contrast" and "sympathy" and "express"
Hope this helps
<em>-kiniwih426</em>
