In both cases, it is considered plagiarism.
- when the post written for the client on the platform will be published on its own blog.
- when a post written for a client resell to another client.
<h3>What is Plagiarism?</h3>
Plagiarism refers to the act when any individual copied the content of another author or writer as presented as their own work without taking permission from them.
In both, the cases consent from the client has not been taken which shows the case of theft, as after giving content to the client it belongs to them only. So both the cases are considered plagiarism.
Learn more about Plagiarism, here:
brainly.com/question/27960172
#SPJ1
Answer on edge is B) subordinating conjunction.
Answer: The word "invigorating" would leave the reader with a more positive impression about the coffee than the word "acidic."
Explanation:
The adjective "acidic", in this context, is used to describe a drink that has a sour taste. If a coffee is sour, it means that it is not prepared properly, or that the coffee prepared is of a low quality. On the other hand, word "invigorating" has a more positive connotation. If something is invigorating, it gives us strength and makes us full of energy. This is exactly what people usually expect from a coffee. Having this in mind, word "invigorating" would certainly leave a reader with a positive impression about the coffee and its smell.
I want to say Excessive pride can lead to one's downfall.