All categories

3 years ago

What type of evidence does Minow use to develop the idea that what is on television lacks value?

English

1 answer:

Serga [27]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Newton Minow used the statistics on time dedicated to different kinds of TV shows in prime evening time to show that what is on TV often lacks value.

Explanation:

Minow explained that in prime time which comes in the evening, out of total of 73 and a half hours available for all the channels that ran in 1961, 59 hours were scheduled for movies, comedies quizzes and action adventures.

By using this evidence, he is able to draw a conclusion that Television prime time is not about giving good information or being useful but being entertaining.

You might be interested in

Read the sentence. Reading books about early American colonies led us to a new understanding of our nation's history. Which unde

Artyom0805 [142]

You didn't mark which nouns are underlined, but concrete nouns are nouns that you can taste, touch, see, smell, or hear (nouns that call on your five senses). Taking all the nouns in your sentence...

books - Can you touch books? See books? Smell books? Yep. So this would be a concrete noun.

colonies - Can you see colonies? Smell colonies? Hear colonies? Well, maybe not present-day, since the American colonies are over and done with, but in general, yeah. Colonies are physical things, a group of people, and groups of people can stink, or smell great, or make a lot of noise. This makes them a concrete noun.

understanding - Can you touch, see, smell, taste, or hear understanding? No, you can't. This is an abstract noun.

history - Can you touch, see, smell, taste, or hear history? In its literal sense, no. History is a study of past events, and that can't be physically touched, heard, or tasted.

In general, anything that's a concept will be an abstract noun. This includes things like history, love, loneliness, et cetera. Anything you can physically put your hands on or use your five senses with will be a concrete noun.

7 0

3 years ago

BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!

Tanya [424]

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.

some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.

in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.

in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.

another way to look at it would be one of the most difficult issues in foreign policy is deciding when the United States should exercise military force. Most people think that military force may be used if a vital national interest of the United States is threatened. The difficulty lies in getting people to agree on what constitutes a vital national interest.

Almost everyone would agree that an attack by a foreign country on the United States threatens a vital interest. Many also would think a vital interest threatened if a country attacked a nation that we had signed a security agreement with. Disagreements emerge when the threat involves the free flow of a precious commodity, such as oil. They also surface over situations that do not pose an immediate threat to U.S. security but could imperil it in the future, such as when a region becomes unstable and the instability may lead to wider conflicts. Another area of debate opens over human rights and humanitarian efforts. The United States is the most powerful democratic nation on Earth. Does that mean we always have a vital interest in promoting human rights and democracy? Or, should we stay out of the affairs of other nations unless they threaten other of our national interests?

Another issue arises over how the United States should exercise military force. Some argue that America should never act unilaterally, but should only act with others, allies or particularly with the United Nations. They believe America has a strong interest in upholding international law. Others agree that it is appropriate to act in coalitions, but they think demanding it in every circumstance would paralyze America’s role as a world leader.

7 0

3 years ago

The statements "I wish you would be friendlier," "You are such a slob," and "You need to have a more positive attitude" are exam

atroni [7]

I personally think someone is being harsh and hateful so hatefulness if that helps

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Robert knew the girl, and he talked to her a little in the boat. No one present understood what they said. Her name was Mariequi

Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

C) The ways in which characters from different social classes perceive and treat each other are addressed.

Explanation:

Realism addresses real-life situations without over dramatizing the plot and scenes. A realist approach in writing will address topics without depicting happy or unrealistic outlooks. In this excerpt, the readers notice how the writer gives details about the poor girl and how Edna observes the differences between them as she looks at her feet and "notices the sand and slime between her brown toes."

6 0

3 years ago

Select the correct text in the passage.

Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago