Are you looking for the best word to call it? It would be colonialism, but it is not necessarily be a bigger country to a smaller country: When then UK dominated India, it was smaller than India (geographically, but bigger militarily).
Hello there!
A person becomes the leader of a democracy by being elected by popular vote. When people are to vote you, this would give you a more of a chance that you would be elected. It most likely that by being the leader of a democracy, you would have to have alot of people to like you, because they have voted for you.
Your correct answer would be the (second option).
A. taking power by force.
B. being elected by popular vote.
C. being the first-born child of the previous leader.
D. receiving votes from the peoples' representatives.
I hope this helps you!
No, he was not hypocritical because he didn't allow slavery. With or without it, it wouldn't have had a big impact on his life so he didn't do it because it helped himself. He did because he had the kindness of heart.
An Arms-Build up would lead to peace due quite frankly, to fear. It would lead to peace, just like for example, North Korea. No one is allowed to have weaponry, meaning fear. No one attempts to revolt, due to fear. Having a militia, would enforce fear, causing no revolts, or riots, or anything of the sort.
Answer:
C. giving consumers access to a wider variety of products.
Explanation:
