Answer: Price after 1 year = $24.83
Explanation:
Return = [D1/P0 ]+ g
= [(3*1.08)/23] + 0.08
= 22.09%
We assume the return is same for next year as well.
Thus,
r = [D2/P1] + g
22.09% = (3*1.082/P1) + 8%
P1 = $24.83
<u>Thus, price after 1 year is $24.83</u>
<u />
Answer:
given statement is true
Explanation:
given statement of purchase marketable security with the cash have not effect on the organization acid test ratio is true because
the cash and marketable security both will be considered for the calculation of acid test ratio and there is not effect
because change by the cash to the marketable securities
so as that given statement is true
Answer:
The Answer is D: Nominal group technique
Explanation:
From the question, it is clear that the CEO of Mi Ola is encouraging everyone to bring up that idea they have in mind. She is encouraging everyone to make a decision as it is never wrong as long as you're moving. Bounded rationality talks about making rational decisions that will most likely satisfy personal needs. This does not seem to be the kind of statement made here. The statement is like a booster to everyone to come up with ideas, which bring us to the concept of nominal group technique. This technique encourages contributions from an entire team and encourages swift agreement on the relative significance of problems, issues, and solutions.
Answer:
A person who works in a company belonging to another country is called an expatriate. These high-ranking personnel are generally sent to other countries, mainly to promote the organizational culture of the company and for corporate purposes to be fulfilled.
It can also be used to train staff in the new country where there are expansion plans.
For example: An operations manager who is moved to another country to manage a new plant of a group, this will be responsible for promoting knowledge and align the ideas of the parent company with the company of the other country.
Answer: Option B
Explanation: Opportunity cost refers to the of loss of profit when an individual or firm chooses one alternative over other.
The statement in the given case, depicts the opportunity cost one has to pay of using the scarce resources that could be sued on different alternatives.
The lunch is never free depicts that one could have used it in other alternatives that may have produced some economic benefits.
Hence, the correct option is B.