Answer:
double declining balance method
Explanation:
Depreciation is an accounting tool to allocate the cost of a long-term asset over time. The reasoning behind is the matching principle. If we associate the entire purchase value at the very first moment, then, one accounting period is taking a hit for an asset that will be use over several accounting periods.
The double declining method applies a rate twice as the straight-line method.
This is applied at the carrying value of the assets (book value) every year for each year of useful life.
There are four chararacteristics, which are:
1. Relatively few transactions affect the account balances, but each transaction is often highly material
2. The exclusion or misstatement of a single transaction can be material
3. A legal relationship exists between the client entity and the holder of the stock, bond, or similar ownership document
4. A direct relationship exists between the interest and dividends accounts and debt and equity
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The country with a comparative advantage in the production of a good should export the good
A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared to other countries.
England
Comparative advantage in the production of scones = 1/50 = 0.02
Comparative advantage in the production of sweater = 50/1 = 50
Scotland
Comparative advantage in the production of scones = 2/40 = 0.05
Comparative advantage in the production of sweater = 40/2 = 20
England has a comparative advantage in the production of scones and should export scones
Scotland has a comparative advantage in the production of sweaters and should export sweaters
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
I would say her best bet would be to attend her local networking events put on by the Chamber of Commerce or start her own as networking can work miracles by pooling the knowledge of various colleagues. Myself I helped start a networking breakfast club and have found work through it and also helped others in the club to find work as well (engineers and geologists contracting and consulting).
