1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pogonyaev
3 years ago
14

What arguments did supporters use What arguments did opponents of trusts use

History
1 answer:
dlinn [17]3 years ago
8 0
Supporters: 

<span>1. This is business NOT a church picnic </span>
<span>2. Social Darwinism allows for the smartest, shrewdest, and wisest to rise above the weak-minded and cowardly in the business arena </span>
<span>3. Trusts help regulate quality and supply for the public </span>

<span>Opponents: </span>

<span>1. Trusts can set prices for the public thus eliminating fair and healthy competition </span>
<span>2. Trusts violate the free market system upon which American business is based </span>
<span>3. Trusts take advantage of small businesses and eventually lead to their death and destruction</span>
You might be interested in
How did the events of September 11 change domestic policy in the United States? Discuss at least three changes.
elena-s [515]
I’m not sure honestly. But hopefully we all figure out
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A study of the generalization most clearly supports the generalization that...
Andre45 [30]
I Think The answer is b I hope it helps
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following BEST describes why civil war broke out between different ethnic and religious groups in Iraq?
Reptile [31]

A.  

They disagreed about who should control certain cities and regions.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is love real or was it made up by Walt Disney
adell [148]

Answer:

made up by walt disney :)

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ILL MARK BRAINLY!!!!!!!!!!!Infer: If Columbus and all European explorers had been kind, and helpful, and never deliberately harm
Tresset [83]

Answer:

A) The natives would have been wiped out by smallpox and other European diseases anyway, since they had no immunity

Explanation:

Even if the Europeans were not cruel and aggressive toward the native populations of the Americas, the end result wouldn't have been much different. The reason for this is that the majority of the deaths of the Native Americans came from the European diseases, as their immune system was not able to cope with them. Yes, there were lot of deaths caused by wars, torture, and forced labor, but compared to the deaths caused by diseases they comprise a very small percentage. The Europeans didn't wanted to wipe out the native populations at all, as their plan was to use them as labor force on their plantations, but that didn't came to be, as the diseases they brought with them had an effect similar to the one of the plague in Europe.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did fdr create japanese internment camps?
    5·1 answer
  • What is crucial to preventing disease?
    13·2 answers
  • What contributions has Walter Prescott Webb made to the arts in Texas?
    14·2 answers
  • The Roman Republic inspired the Enlightenment philosopher _____ to base his political theory on the separation of powers and on
    11·1 answer
  • Which caused the price of grain from the plains to fall?
    7·2 answers
  • Which word in the sentence is a proper adjective? Sara enjoys British literature, especially the plays of Shakespeare.
    13·2 answers
  • Use the cartoon and your knowledge of US history to answer question 15.
    12·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLS....... Which process could not occur if Earth's atmosphere did not absorb heat from the sun?
    5·2 answers
  • Tại sao nói con người là nghệ sĩ
    13·1 answer
  • What is the main idea of this cartoon?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!