Answer: Costs of items used up this period but paid for next period
Explanation:
Period Expenses for the period are transactions that should be expensed because they were used in the current period.
Therefore if a period cost is not used in the period, it is not considered a period cost even if the company pays for it in the current period which also means that if a period cost for the period is not paid in the current period but in the next one, it is still a period cost for the current period.
From the above therefore, the period cost is the cost of items used up in this period but paid for in the next one.
The land purchased might look like the obvious choice but it is not because Assets are capitalised and not expensed.
Answer:
1) - proprietorships.
2) - corporations.
3) - proprietorships.
4) - corporations.
Explanation:
So far as figures are concerned, the majority of companies are proprietorships. Even so, mostly based on currency sales revenue, almost all of the trade is conducted by corporations. Businesses are mostly founded as proprietorships and only transformed into corporations until their success results in drawbacks that overshadow the benefits.
So, the following are the reason that describes the following answers are true according to the given scenario.
A
395395/10871087 x 100%= 3.64% of people said it was a good thing
Answer:
$50 or slightly less
Explanation:
If we assume that there is four persons namely E, S, A and K
The producer surplus is the surplus that shows the difference between the seller value and the seller cost
In the case when the seller bid against each other so here the producer surplus would be $100 or slightly less
Here only one person could able to send the good i.e. person E As the cost to the person would be lowered by the goods value
Therefore the option B is correct
The attitude toward each other.
