<span>the state or condition of being superior to all others in authority, power, or status.</span>
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
sorry I don't know this answer.
Answer:
wait 2minutes I will give you answer
Answer:
ethnomethodologists
Explanation:
Ethnomethodologists are referred to that person or researcher that does the details study about everyday life. they study like when to laugh between any conversation or when to applaud. This study was done because there is a vast difference between the laugh, applaud and boo. it defines your etiquette.
This research was initiated by Harold Garfinkel and study how people behave in their day to day life
