The answer to your question is C
Answer: descriptive because the scientists are writing down observations but not making comparisons
Explanation:
The options are:
a. comparative, because the scientists will be making observations in order to form a hypothesis
b. comparative, because the scientists are measuring dependent and independent variables.
c. descriptive, because the scientists are using independent variables to test a hypothesis.
d. descriptive, because the scientists are writing down observations but not making comparisons.
The best option that describes this type of investigation is descriptive because the scientists are writing down observations but not making comparisons.
The descriptive investigation is simply used to describe a phenomenon. A descriptive investigation gives an accurate and factual descriptions of a particular without comparing them.
Answer:
1. Roma videmus
-Here, Rome would need to be in the accusative case since it is the direct object. The correct word would be <em>Romam.</em>
2. Romani viae visito
-Visito is first person meaning "I visit." The correct word would be <em>visitant.</em>
-Again, you need to use the accusative case for direct objects. The correct word here would be <em>vias.</em>
3. Romani pugnae spectabimus
-Spectabimus translates to "We will watch." The correct word would have been <em>spectabunt.</em>
-Again, battles needs to be in the accusative case since it is being watched. The correct word would be <em>pugnas.</em>
Hope this helps.
Answer:
complimenting
Explanation:
by saying something is funny and then laughing you are further proving the point.
