1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
icang [17]
3 years ago
10

Why was wine adopted as a ritual drink in Christianity but Islam prohibited the use of alcohol?

History
2 answers:
aleksklad [387]3 years ago
6 0
That's a good question. The original view on it has faded over the years and to this day cannot be confirmed yet some believed that it was to rectify the blood of Christ, as to say that by sipping away at the life force of the grapes (nature). Therefore taunting the world, leading the dark from the temptations and the light into salvation.
lina2011 [118]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The reason why wine adopted as a ritual drink in Christianity but Islam prohibited the use of alcohol is the following.

For Muslim people, Islam does not consider to drink alcohol because it is bad for your health, and Islam you do not harm your body. The opposite case is found in Christianity, where priest drinks wine in remembrance of the Last Supper, when Christ had dinner with his apostles and said "This is the blood of Christ.." and blessed the wine and drank it.

You might be interested in
Analyzing What was the main reason that Anti-
Naddik [55]

Answer:

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

Their opposition was an important factor leading to the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Who where the helots
lbvjy [14]
The Helots were state-owned serfs of the ancient Spartans.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What areas during the 1890 and 1920 in American needed reform?
slava [35]
I would say government and rights of the public to decide whether we should war or not.
3 0
3 years ago
Which pair of events shows a cause-and-effect relationship!
Natasha_Volkova [10]
Idk there just making me answers
3 0
3 years ago
I need help I really don’t know
Maurinko [17]

Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.

In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.

In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • in your opinion, what is wrong with applying the statement "The best things in life are free" to the topics of love and marriage
    9·1 answer
  • What areas of land did the Mongol Empire include?
    8·1 answer
  • Who abolished slavery ​
    5·2 answers
  • Nothing is good or bad, but it is<br>our thinking which makes it so.​
    11·1 answer
  • Hard money includes all election campaign donations to individual candidates that can be used for advertising or other campaign
    6·2 answers
  • 3. The Peace Corps uses mainly_____ ______<br><br> to achieve its goals.
    9·1 answer
  • About ten thousand years ago, climate change began to impact early humans’ lives. How did the climate change?
    10·2 answers
  • Stalin j country-allied or axis power
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Briefly identify and explain the causes of World War I.
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the Declaration of Independence so important in 1776?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!