The calculated profit per unit for base-case, worst-case is, and best-case for the management of Brinkley corporation is:
<h3>The Profit per unit for base-case:</h3>
45 - 1 1- 24 - 3 = $7
<h3>Profit per unit for worst case:</h3>
45 - 12 - 25 - 3 = $3 per unit
<h3>Profit per unit for best case:</h3>
45 - 10 - 20 - 3 = 12$ per unit
b. The mean profit per unit is given as $7.05
c. The reason the simulation approach is preferable is due to the fact that it can help to determine the probability of profit as a particular amount, unlike the what-if scenario analysis.
It can also create different scenarios for possible resources.
d. The probability of the fact that the profit per unit woul be less than 5 is 9%
Read more on risk analysis here: brainly.com/question/6955504
Answer:
Sales = 12,50,000
Explanation:
Detailed steps are given below
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not attach any text, article, or particular reference to answer this question. So we assume you are talking in general terms.
So being that the case, we can comment on the following.
It is true that emerging technologies are impacting organizations. Some businesses and organizations have been overwhelmed by technological advances. We are talking about new technologies that are transforming the workplace such as biometrics, analytics, robotics, big data, or artificial intelligence.
What organizations can do to reduce the burden of digitalization is having a gradual transformation. Not a sudden or abrupt change. A step by stape process is highly recommended. But procrastination at all. The digital transformation should start now.
It has to start with a process of training to make employees aware of the necessity of change.
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
It includes the combination of the various institutions, agencies, entities, decision-making processes, and patterns of consumption that comprise the economic structure of a given community. As such, an economic system is a type of social system....
