The delegates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 had to main compromises. One of them was the issue about slavery.<span> This compromise was called the 3/5 compromise. This had something to do on how slavery would be counted for the intention of determining representation. Some of the states that owned slaves wanted them to count in the population, so they could have a larger number of representatives in the House. There was also a compromise on the slave trade it could not be banned for 20 years after the ratification of the Constitution.</span>
<span> </span>
The Omicron Variant is different from previous variants in some ways such as:
- Impact on Society.
- Impact on Individuals.
<h3>Impact on Society </h3>
The omicron variant is more contagious than previous variants which means that there will be more hospitalizations and therefore a heavier burden on the medical sector.
It is however less deadly which means that lower death rates will be seen.
<h3>Impact on Individuals </h3>
As the variant is more contagious, more people will have to be quarantined which would rob them of their time.
There will however be less death so the impact on individuals will be less severe.
In conclusion, the omicron variant will be less deadly.
Find out more on Coronavirus at brainly.com/question/24294254.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. It is not true that the Plessy v. Ferguson case paved the way for the Little Rock 9 to attend Central High School.
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court in 1896 that ruled on the constitutionality of the right of the states of the Union to impose racial segregation in public places under the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The court decided, by 7 votes to 1, to declare that segregation in the southern states did not violate the Constitution (in particular the 14th Amendment which stated that all citizens were equal before the law). Judge Henry Billings Brown, speaking for the majority that approved the decision, said that the segregation done in the state of Louisiana did not imply inferiority, in the eyes of the law, of African Americans and that the separation by race in public places and services was a mere political issue. The dissenting voice within the Court, Judge John Marshall Harlan, strongly condemned his colleagues and said that this decision would be as negatively striking as the "Dred Scott Case". He added that the law of the United States did not state that the country had a caste system, that the constitution did not see the color of its citizens' skin and that everyone was equal under the law. Several jurists agreed with Harlan and the nation was divided over it. The southern states, however, rejoiced that their system of segregation by race now had a legal basis to support itself.