The correct answer is <span>sponsoring wars of liberation and revolutions
For example, during the cold war, proxy wars were common between the Soviets and the United States. Since they couldn't fight each others, they decided to support opposing factions in other countries. For example, Afghanistan campaign where the Soviets tried to take the area was opposed by the Taliban locals who were supported by the United States. </span>
leichschaltung is the German term applied to the Nazification of German society following the Nazi seizure of power in 1933. Once Hitler became chancellor, he and the Nazi Party sought to “coordinate” all political, social, and cultural institutions with the Nazi state. This “coordination” was done in the name of national unity. However, it allowed the Nazi Party to extend its power by creating a single party state. Everything was subject to coordination: local government, professional organizations, social clubs, leisure activities—even those for children.
The state enforced coordination from the top-down. At the same time, many Germans responded with a bottom-up coordination of their own. This was known as Selbstgleichschaltung. Even Hitler was surprised with the speed and ease of remaking Germany. He noted “everything is going much faster than we ever dared to hope.”1
Answer:
Neo Baroque is discussed below
Explanation:
- The Baroque restoration of the architecture also known as the Neo-Baroque it was an architectural style of the late 19th century.
- The phrase is applied to illustrate the architecture and architectural figures that represent significant features of Baroque form but are not of the primary Baroque period.
- Italian Baroque architecture has various essential characteristics. It usually comprises curving forms including oval forms and a mixture of convex and concave forms that make walls appears to swing or look curved with a great sense of motion.
Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
Answer:
The correct answer will be ( B )
Explanation:
:)
