1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gala2k [10]
2 years ago
9

"what was the chief reason for colonial discontent just prior to the first shots?"

History
2 answers:
lisov135 [29]2 years ago
5 0
The chief reason for colonial discontent just prior to the First shots was the stationing of British troops in cities. By the mid-1770s, though, the relationship between the American colonies and their British rulers had become so tense, so poisoned, so regarded as by disbelief and resentment that the once seemingly indestructible bonds of empire were on the verge of dissolution. And in the spring of 1775, the first shots were fired in a war that would sooner or later win America its independence.
frutty [35]2 years ago
4 0

The chief reason for colonial discontent just prior to the First shots was the stationing of British troops in cities.  

Further Explanation:  

British troops:  

In October 1768, British troops touched base in the city of Boston and involved the city. Pressures prompted the Boston Massacre on March 5, 1770, and the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773. In light of the Tea Party and different challenges, Parliament authorized the Intolerable Acts to rebuff the states.  

British Army during the American Revolution:  

At the episode of the Revolutionary War in 1775, the absolute size of the British armed force, barring civilian army, comprised of 48,647 fighters (Fey 9). Of these troopers around 39,294 were infantry, 6,869 were rangers and 2,484 were mounted guns.  

British troops positioned in the states:  

In 1765 Parliament passed the Quartering Act that said the pioneers expected to discover or pay for hotel for British troopers positioned in America. With the French and Indian War over, numerous settlers saw no requirement for troopers to be positioned in the provinces. England likewise required cash to pay for its war obligations.

Subject: history

Level: High School

Keywords: British troops, British Army during the American Revolution, British troops positioned in the states.  

Related links:  

Learn more about evolution on

brainly.com/question/1280356

brainly.com/question/1596857

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements about Mohandas Gandhi is false?
Paul [167]

Answer:

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was an Indian lawyer, anti-colonial nationalist, and political ethicist, who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India's independence from British rule, and in turn inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world.

5 0
2 years ago
What year was the first civil war
xenn [34]

Answer:

Apr 12, 1861 – Apr 9, 1865

Explanation:

The American Civil War was a civil war in the United States fought between states supporting the federal union and southern states that voted to secede and form the Confederate States of America

7 0
3 years ago
Someone please help ASAP will give brainliest
Rus_ich [418]
Germany not being punished in the war would have made the nazi party more of a fringeparty
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
describe the different views between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist regarding the Constitution and its ratification. needs t
jasenka [17]
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
8 0
3 years ago
How did Alexander Palmer justify the Palmer Raids of 1919 and 1920? Palmer supported taking radical action against conservatives
MrRa [10]
<span>Alexander Palmer justified the Palmer Raids of 1919 and 1920 when Palmer warned of an imminent communist takeover.

A raid done on the Union of Russian Workers headquarters on November 25, 1919 uncovered a bombed factory hidden behind a false wall. This discovery lend credence to the threat of communist takeover. 



</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is inca? <br><br> help help
    6·1 answer
  • Regarding the Magna Carta, which statement is false?
    15·1 answer
  • The United States emerged as an Imperialist power following
    8·1 answer
  • What is a major goal of the juvenile justice system?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a pull?
    5·2 answers
  • Which three films did Steven Spielberg direct that were among the top ten highest grossing films of the 20th century?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes an economic effect of European imperialism in Africa
    12·2 answers
  • Which describes the main difference between perestroika and glasnost?
    12·2 answers
  • Importance of Modals Explanation
    11·2 answers
  • Hi Who want to talk to me​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!