The right answer is none of the above, its Bonds payable.
One of the main reason is He <span>Knocked out in one of the games during high school. Grange remained unconscious for two days after the blow and started to experience difficulity in speaking. This make his career became really blurry and none of the team want to sign him. In the end, he had to make his own team.</span>
Owners of the company.
<h3>
What is a stock of a company?</h3>
- A stock usually referred to as equity, is a type of investment that denotes ownership in a portion of the issuing company.
- Shares, also known as units of stock, entitle their owners to a share of the company's assets and income in proportion to the number of shares they possess.
<h3>What is an owner of a company?</h3>
- A company's "owner" is a person who owns all of the shares.
- In contrast, a "co-owner" shares ownership of a business with one or more partners.
- The owner, who is frequently the company's founder, is free to run their business however they like.
Therefore, Lorenzo and Lila are owners of the Double L Corporation.
Know more about stocks here:
brainly.com/question/1957305
#SPJ4
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
re 17.4600%
Explanation:
We will calculate using the Modigliani Miller proposition with no taxes to solve for the cost of equity of a levered firm
We plus our values into the formula and solve
re 17.4600%
