1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nitella [24]
3 years ago
11

An appraiser has assigned the following weights to three adjusted sale prices: Comparable 1: $329,500 45% weight Comparable 2: $

320,900 35% weight Comparable 3: $312,000 20% weight What is the reconciled estimated market value of the subject property?
Business
1 answer:
n200080 [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

$322,990

Explanation:

The reconciled estimated market value of the subject property will be calculated as follows:

($329,500 X 0.45) + ($320,900 X 0.35) + ($312,000 X 0.2) = $322,990

You might be interested in
What is the periodic interest on a credit card with a 17.99% APR?
harina [27]
The answer to the question is D.998
4 0
3 years ago
Fast Turnstiles Co. is evaluating the extension of credit to a new group of customers. Although these customers will provide $41
k0ka [10]

Answer:

Follows are the solution to this question:

Explanation:

In point A-1:

Calculating the value of Incremental sales after tax:  

Further revenues= $414,000  

Recognize(Less)=Costs

Debt worth =$33,120  

Set Exp. = $17,400    

Production and commercialization cost= $314,640  

Pre-sales tax =$48,840.  

Lower: 35%   tax = $17,094  

Incremental tax income =$31,746

In point A-2:

Determine profits for extra expenditure  

Extra spending on debts = \frac{ \$ 414,000}{\$ 5}

                                         = \$ 82,800.

Return on the Expenditure = \frac{\$ 31746}{ \$ 82800}

                                             = 38.34 \%

In point A-3:

Yeah, For the Fast Turnstiles company must provide certain consumers with loans.

In point B-1:

Incremental taxes after-tax calculation:  

Further sales = $ 414,000    

Return: Costs  

gross debt= $45,540    

Set Exp = $17,400  

Cost for production and marketing = $314,640  

Net profits=$ 36,420  

Without tax 35% = $12,747  

Incremental tax revenue= $23,673    

In point B-2:    

Determine profits for extra expenditure  

Extra investment in debts = \frac{ \$ 414,000 }{ \$ 5}

                                             = \$ 82,800

Incremental return on that investment = \frac{\$ 23673}{\$ 82800}

                                                                   = 28.59 \%  

In point B-3:      

Yeah, The Fast Turnstiles company must provide to certain consumers to credit.

In point C-1:    

The incremental tax revenue estimate  

$414,000 = excess revenue  

Remember Costs

Debt worth= $ 33,120  

set Exp = $17,400    

Production and commercialization cost=  $314,640  

Pre- sales  tax = $48,840.  

Less: 35% Tax = $17,094  

Incremental tax income=  $31,746  

Calculate profits for extra expenditure  

Extra Accounting Investment = \frac{\$ 414000}{1.6}

                                                 = \$ 258750

Incremental Return= \frac{\$ 31,746} {\$ 258,750}

                                = 12.27 \%

In point C-2:

Yeah, its credit should be granted to all these consumers through Fast Turnstiles company limited.

3 0
3 years ago
Scenario 13-3 Ziva is an organic lettuce farmer, but she also spends part of her day as a professional organizing consultant. As
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

c. −$80.

Explanation:

The computation of the economic profit is shown below:

Economic profit = Total revenue - Cost of seeds - Earning foregone

where,

Total sales revenue is $300

Cost of seeds is $130

And, the earning foregone is

= 10 hours × $25

= $250

So, the economic profit is

= $300 - $130 - $250

= -$80

We simply applied the above formula to determine the economic profit

5 0
3 years ago
If the Netherlands enjoys comparative advantage in the production of dairy products, it implies that the opportunity cost of pro
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with its trading partners.

I hope my answer helps you

7 0
3 years ago
Would you prefer a fully taxable investment earning 8.1 percent or a tax-exempt investment earning 6.1 percent? (assume a 28 per
blsea [12.9K]
<span>Prefer the 6.1 percent tax-exempt investment. Let's do the math and see why the tax-exempt investment is the better choice. For the 8.1% taxable investment, you get taxed at the rate of 28%. Which means that you only get to keep 100%-28% = 72% of your gains. So 0.72 * 8.1 = 5.832 which means your effective earning percentage is only 5.832% which is less than the 6.1% rate you get for the tax-exempt investment. Another consideration that wasn't taken into account for the question is the earnings on the taxable investment may push you up into a higher tax bracket. Which in turn increases the tax burden on your other investments. So the better choice here is the 6.1% tax-exempt investment even though that first glance the 8.1% investment looks higher.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The national? freshman-to-sophomore retention rate has held steady at? 74%. a certain college has 477477 of the 587587 freshman
    8·1 answer
  • Anybody know how to do FIFO / LIFO Accountancy stuff?
    9·1 answer
  • You currently own a portfolio valued at $52,000 that has a beta of 1.16. you have another $10,000 to invest and would like to in
    11·1 answer
  • What is a business?
    5·1 answer
  • Different companies using the same accounting principles is an example of _________________. For instance, this occurs when two
    9·1 answer
  • 3.what does it mean when a economist says that a consumer has demand for a good or service?
    10·1 answer
  • A hypermarket is Multiple Choice a shopping mall anchored by four or more department stores such as Sears or Nordstrom. a form o
    10·1 answer
  • A company that makes fasteners and sells them to many different
    15·2 answers
  • A brief description of the contract and the parties involved
    7·1 answer
  • If an organization wanted to improve employee involvement, efficiency, and customer satisfaction, what kind analysis might they
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!