Since the
speed of many physiological processes in marine organisms is determined by the
temperature, the first consequence of the changes in the conditions of the
medium becomes offset the timing of seasonal events, such as the timing of
spawning fish. There have also offset migration routes and spawning areas. So,
as a result of warming in the Sea of Japan, spawning navaga shifted to an
earlier date, because of the reduction of the area of "cold spots"
in the eastern Bering Sea shelf feeding migration of pollock, halibut and crab
are lengthened, but because of the temperature rise to the east of Japan,
spawning saury expanding. These changes significantly affect the success of
reproduction, resulting in changes populations of their fishery.
The option that is an example of the "ethical dilemma" of creating and destroying human embryos is option A: Some people..."believe an embryo has the same moral standing as a human being?"
<h3>What moral dilemmas do embryonic stem cells present?</h3>
The infinite differentiation potential of iPSCs, which can be used for human cloning and pose a risk for the creation of human embryos and human-animal chimeras, is the center of the current ethical debates surrounding stem cell-based therapies.
However, due to the fact that it involves the killing of human embryos, hESC research is morally and politically contentious. The controversy over abortion has a strong connection to the issue of when human existence begins in the United States.
Learn more about human embryos from
brainly.com/question/2625384
#SPJ1
I think its the immune system <span>¯\_(ツ)_/¯</span>
Diamond are created from coal after 1000's of years under pressure.
it cause a change in propertied but not elements
