The first step is to write each factor in expanding notation.
This is:
- 124 = 100 + 20 + 4
- 2 = 2
Now muliply 2 times each term of the terms 100, 20 and 4
=> 2 * 100 = 200
2 * 20 = 40
2 * 4 = 8
Then,
(100 + 20 + 4 )
x 2
-----------------------
8
40
200
------------------------
248
Answer:
16
Step-by-step explanation:
If shes out for 3 hours, times 2 by 3, 2x3 then they have a fee of 10 at the beginning then you add that on to 6 then you get 16. ( Sorry if I'
m wrong this is just how I was taught )
The third angle is 105.
How do I know this?
Add 22 and 53:
22 + 53 = 75
All interior angles on a triangle should add up to 180.
Subtract 75 from 180:
180 - 75 = 105
105 is our answer.
Hope this helps! =)
Please insert a image but i think the answer would be C or B
Answer:
In a nutshell, 
is not equivalent to 
.
Step-by-step explanation:
Now we proceed to demonstrate that Edgar's statement is false:
1) Given
2) 
Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse
3) 
4) 
Modulative property/Existence of multiplicative inverse
5) 
/Result
In a nutshell, is not equivalent to .
