Answer:
Total E&P = $ 160000
Total voting Right Sold = 50/ (100+100) = 25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 160000*25%
Reduction of E& P due to exchange = 40000
Reduction of E& P Lower of Total E&P*Total voting Right Sold or Amount realised
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or (50*1000)
Reduction of E& P Lower of 40000 or 50000
Answer
A reduction of $40,000 in E&P because of the exchange.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The market should determine the price of goods and services only. The commercialization of human organs would increase the existing social inequality. This is because poor people would only be able to sell their organs, meaning they would not have the ability to buy a kidney if they needed it. On the other hand, it would increase the sale of kidneys for material survival itself, which is morally reprehensible.
Here is the answer that best completes the statement above. According to the given text, when you are thinking about your "academic anatomy", this preference is a way to get a handle on what you feel satisfying and fulfilling. Hope this helps.
No, Because Harriet had no knowledge of the painting for her house, While there was an added benefit. There is no quasi-contract at all.
Answer:
rent
Explanation:
The rent expense will be difficult to revise. Usually, the rent amount is contained in a tenancy agreement signed by both the landlord and the tenant. The rent amount does not change until the lease or tenancy agreement expires. Changing the rent amount would require the landlord's consent.
Due to the above reasons, rent is classified as a fixed cost. It remains constant in the short run.
