The act ignored the traditional Native American views of land ownership. Hope this helps!
One of the obligations of the federal government to the states is to ensure a republican form of government
The Supreme Court established the rule in Luther v. Borden 1 that disputes arising under this provision are political, not judicial, in nature and that "it lies with Congress to determine whether the government is the established one in a State... as well as its republican character."
In Texas v. White 3, it was decided that the President's decision to establish temporary governments after the war was justified, if at all, only as an exercise of his authority as Commander-in-Chief and that these governments were only to be regarded as temporary ones to carry out governmental duties while Congress considered its options.
Learn more about government here
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
The main cause of the breakup of extended families in the Middle East is "<span>b. poverty". In general, families will send children to live with people who can afford to raise them if possible.</span>
Answer:
Placed restrictions on trade
Explanation:
The mercantile system of the British opposed by the colonists because it put them under restrictions. British as an Empire required wealth. British established colonies in America so that they could gain raw materials and make profits. They did not want the Americans to gain self-dependent by engaging in trading with the other Europeans nation like the Netherlands. The British put taxes on imported goods to discourage this practice, and this forced the colonists to buy only British goods. The Navigation Acts and the Sugar Act passed to regulate the colonial trade.
Correct answer:
<h2>Limited government</h2>
The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government. It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution. Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.
For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written. They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself. As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."
Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.
