Nations that can be compared to the US are many and wide from drastically different to slightly different.
Explanation:
Nations around the world can be termed according to their difference from US in terms of culture and way of life along with demographics too.
The commonwealth countries like Canada UK Australia New Zealand are some of the ones that are very similar to US in that they share the languages and the dominant races there are white.
They are also culturally similar.
Other countries in Europe share cultural ties but are linguistically different in themselves and most people who live there are multilingual unlike the US.
This is also somewhat true for most of Asia.
To be a informed citizen you will need to help out like doing community service , and also attending all your community events , or not doing bad things in your community and give your community a good image and that is how you can become a informed reliable citizen <span />
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In which.
"In which" is not grammatically suitable. If we switch "in" then it will be a grammatically accurate sentence.
Explanation:
The fresh Immigrants In the beginning 1800s, the largest immigrants were Protestants from western and northern Europe. Many talked English and had participation in democracy. By difference, most of the “fresh immigrants” who began to appear in the advanced 1800s came from countries of eastern and southern Europe, such as Russia, Poland, Italy, and Greece. Most were Jewish or Catholic. A less number came from Asia and the Pacific. Few learned English or had practice living in a democracy or a capital.
Answer:
This illustrates: <u>Overreliance on anecdotes.</u>
Explanation:
What Dr McDonald is using to validate and support his treatment for ADHD are mearly anecdotes, which are not sufficient enough in the scientific field. To justufy a practice or a treatment a professional should consider a theory that has been accurate and has prove of its results.
Overreliance on anecdotes means putting all the justification of the validity of a treatment, only over people´s testimony.