Answer:released from relocation centers
Explanation:
It was "conformity" that marked American mainstream society in the 1950s, which is why the 1960s are often referred to as a period of counterculture.
The correct answer is indeed A) kept interest rates low.
Ok, let me try to resume.
When the central bank injects reserves, it encourages banks to lend out money at lower interest, attracting borrowers for this money and leading entrepreneurs to invest, once the higher interest rates would not be profitable. Interest rates coordinate savers and investors action. Investment requires resources to be frozen rather than consumed, meaning that less spending by the population reflects more resources available to fund these investments, resulting in a lower rate of interest.
When interest rates are pushed down by creating new money, the lower interest rate is not a representation of genuine savings by the public, it is artificially low. Increased business activity consumes resources while the population also keeps consuming more, causing a "tug-of-war" for resources between longer and shorter processes. When prices and interest eventually starts to rise, entrepreneurs find out their investment aren't actually profitable with these rates and are unable to complete the projects they started. This is the economic bubble, when the real economy can't withstand the perceived economy.
Now, finally going back into the answer.
During the late 1920s rates were kept artificially low by the Federal Reserve, sparking a boom, specially in the stock market, with prices rising up to 50 percent quickly. In 1929, once the government started tightening credit to cool down the overheated stock market it produced, the burst happened, leading the country into the Great Depression.
Sorry for the long explanation, hope you understand the concept ;)
Sharecropping can be considered a legalized form of slavery because it contained many of the same elements.
Sharecropping is a system in which a landlord rents a plot of land to a tenant. During this era, the land would be owned by a white plantation owner (most of the time) and the person renting the land would be a former slave. This tenant would then be responsible for producing as much product as possible in order to give their payment to the land owner. This is similar to slavery, as the plantation owner benefits from another person's hard work.
Since the survival of the tenant depends on how well they farm, they are less likely to leave the land. This is similar to slavery, as leaving leaving a plantation greatly decreased a slaves chance of survival.
<span>withdraw formally from membership in a federal union.</span>
<span> Hope I could help also do you mind putting thanks for me:)?</span>
<span>
</span>
