Answer:
The adoption of the Declaration of Independence of 1776 entailed the need to establish regional governments. Separation from the mother country meant that the North American territories were no longer colonies of the British Empire, but became independent states. Already in the early stages of the development of the self-determination process, a conflict with Great Britain became apparent. The revolutionary movement had previously intended to break with Britain as a whole, and it was imperative to establish some form of legitimate government. The main efforts were initially aimed at ignoring the power of the royal governors. Provincial congresses or committees formed in various ways sought to go their own way with the adoption of their own constitutions.
Speaking about the prerequisites for the adoption of the constitutions of the colonies and the future federal constitution, it should also be noted that the constitution, being the main law of the state, reflects the most important patterns of the development of society.
The constituent parts of the preamble of the constitutions were bill of rights, or a declaration of rights, which contained a list of bourgeois-democratic rights and freedoms, as well as guarantees of the inviolability of the person (freedom of conscience, freedom of the press, right to a speedy and impartial jury trial, the right not to give evidence against self).
The legal and political ideas and views of prominent revolutionaries such as Payne, Franklin, Adams, Jefferson served as an important prerequisite for the adoption of the constitutions of the colonies and the federation. It is no coincidence that in the period preceding the US Declaration of Independence, many European legal ideas experienced a rebirth in the New World. So, on the eve of the creation of an independent North American state, in 1775, the famous lawyer, enlightener, future second US president John Adams argued that the purpose of the constitution was “the creation of a government of laws, not of people,” that is, a power based on impartial rules and regulations and not on the prejudices or preferences inherent in man.
Explanation:
Answer:
Check Explanation.
Explanation:
Fannie Lou Hamer was an activist and was born in the year 1917, she died in the year 1977. Anne moody was an author (she was the one that wrote " The coming of age in Mississippi'' and an activist. Anne moody was born on the 15th day of September, 1940 and died on the 5th of February, In the year 2015.
Both Fannie Lou Hamer and Anne moody were activists that were discriminated because of the colour of their skin(that is race) because they are both African-Americans and they both fought for equality.
The difference between Fannie Lou Hamer and Anne moody was that Fannie Lou Hamer campaigned against race discrimination by using political means such as registration of voters and she belonged to Freedom democratic party WHILE Anne moody was much more of an author and civil Rights activist which is not attached to any political party.
Answer:
The one who would inherit future problems is Herbert Hoover
Answer:
I hope this helps
Explanation:
The Scientific Revolution of the Early Modern Period was a significant era of discovery. New concepts such as heliocentrism and natural philosophy contributed to a society in which science dictated law. ... Science is clearly emphasized in schooling and STEM continues to progress.
How it impacted society today....
The scientific revolution, which emphasized systematic experimentation as the most valid research method, resulted in developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology, and chemistry. These developments transformed the views of society about nature.
The correct answer here is Constantinople.
Constantinople was founded by Constantine the Great who created the city as a new capital of the Roman Empire. After the dissolution of the Roman empire the city became the capital of the Byzantine Empire. It was the seat of the Emperor and the center of culture and commerce.
