The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
Internal terrorism and external terrorism both pose a great threat, but terrorism carried out by the United State's own citizens can be much more harmful in the long run. My favorite quote about this is nerdy, but it's from Captain America: Civil War and is stated by the true antagonist of the movie, "An empire toppled by its enemies can rise again. But one which crumbles from within? That's dead... forever." We as a people can rally against an outside threat and rise from whatever they may do to us, but we become exponentially weaker if we must rally against those within our own borders. That's just kinda my opinion.
I believe your answer is Russia! I hope this helps!! :)
-K
2. Nationalists believe that their country is better than all others. It’s really a toxic philosophy, though, since we live in a global society where every country is connected economically. It’s especially confusing in America, because America is a country of Native Americans and immigrants.
The answer is d i got it right
