1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinil7 [7]
3 years ago
6

Why did the Suez Canal increase European interest in the Ottoman Empire?

History
2 answers:
stealth61 [152]3 years ago
7 0
The correct answer is <span>C:The canal went through Muslim-controlled waterways to Asia.

The suez canal was of extreme importance for trading with the East and the Ottomans controlled it. If it happened that Ottomans disliked someone, they could just ban them from going through the canal which would severely harm the economy of that other country. That's why it was in the best interest of everyone in Europe to stay on the Ottoman's good side.</span>
Aneli [31]3 years ago
5 0
The Suez Canal increased European interest in the Ottoman Empire because "<span>C:The canal went through Muslim-controlled waterways to Asia", since this greatly opened up new possibilities for trade.</span>
You might be interested in
What was the name of the Supreme Court Case that declared "separate but equal" unconstitutional? A. Miranda v. Arizona B. Brown
FromTheMoon [43]

Brown v Board of Education. This was the reason segregation was against the law

5 0
3 years ago
President Chester A. Arthur urged, “a liberal appropriation for the support of Indian schools” at twenty years later Henry Adams
Ierofanga [76]

The Russians created a new communist government that aligned with the Central Powers instead.

6 0
3 years ago
What are three important events in Muhammad Ali's life?
olya-2409 [2.1K]
1954:When his bike was stolen he promised to "whup whoever stole it"
1960:He wins the light-heavyweight  gold medal at the Summer Olympics
1979: announces retirement

I hope these help...
6 0
3 years ago
One major difference between McPherson's and Horwitz's historical interpretation of the Civil War.
TiliK225 [7]
The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.
4 0
3 years ago
For what kind of government did Thoreau advocate?
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

Limited government

Explanation:

:)

brainliest?

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What role do the federal courts play in checking the power of the legislative branch?
    8·1 answer
  • In New England Large-scale farming was difficult.
    10·1 answer
  • What did a guild do for the merchants? set up rules and prices set up shops and fairs bought land and shops trained new merchant
    8·2 answers
  • Use the excerpt to answer the question.
    13·2 answers
  • Cuales fueron los factores que generaron la caida del directorio<br> por favor necesito ayuda!
    7·1 answer
  • By what year did the area around 140th Street and 7th Avenue become populated primarily by African Americans?
    15·1 answer
  • Workers who have gone on strike get angry when workers who have not gone on strike try to cross picket lines.
    12·1 answer
  • How would you have responded to the attack on Pearl Harbor?
    12·1 answer
  • Will Mark Brainliest
    12·1 answer
  • This cartoon shows women riding on a steamroller labeled as "Progress.” Beneath the steamroller are rocks labeled as "Opposition
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!