Answer:
C
Explanation:
My mom explained this to me.its the same in america we have certain rules and regulations of how we do things. So say if you have a paten under your name someone can't try to make a company under the same name *in that state of course so my mom owned a business. With that being said there are rules to protect each and every business.like the little r means registered trademark symbol. Sorry if this isnt helpful but do realize your in college and im barely in freshman year.
Yea I think that people who are married are less likely to commit suicide than people who are divorced because when you're married is like you're not lonely not saying that when you're divorced you're lonely but like it's just better when you have someone I think
B. It consists of mostly short-answer and fill-in-the-blank items.
It actually doesn't have any short answer questions. Most of the PSAT is multiple choice.
The correct answer is B. Trust, competence and ethos.
The speaker will inspire credibility from the audience when it perceives his or her character and their ethos concerning the topic they are presenting. If they know it really well, they will speak with authority, which will engender trust. Their competence is manifested and it's easier for the audience believe and received what it's being conveyed.
Answer:
When there are conflicting decisions on the same issue by different court of appeals and when there is a rulling based on racial discrimination.
Explanation:
A writ of certiorari is simply an order a higher court such as the Supreme Court gives for them to evaluate the decisions and processes in a lower court. This enables the higher court to ascertain if there are wrongdoings in the process. Cases have been brought to the U.S Supreme Court on a regular basis through this method and they have granted only about 1.1% of over a thousand cases.
Writ of certiorari can be issued when a court of appeals in the U.S has made a decision in court which is conflicting with the decision made by another court of appeals in the same country, on the same issue. The losing party in both scenarios here can appeal to the Supreme Court.
Also, where there is an appeal court ruling that does not favor a citizen on a basis of racial discrimination with no precedent, the decision can be appealed. Similar incident happened in the case by Ricky Brown, Raishawn Morris, Charles Battiste against the City of Oneonta, New work in which it was alleged that the enforcement officials carried their tasks while targeting minority members of the area for interrogation based on race.
