When is the only time a new justice may be appointed?

1 answer:

5 0

The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution, which have been further refined and developed by decades of tradition. Candidates are nominated by the President of the United States and must face a series of hearings in which both the nominee and other witnesses make statements and answer questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which can vote to send the nomination to the full United States Senate.[1] Confirmation by the Senate allows the President to formally appoint the candidate to the court.[1] The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.

Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975. In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.....

Hope this helps ;)

You might be interested in

How did the increase in immigration help american industries?

pogonyaev

Answer:

These claims suggest that immigrants contribute to economic growth by increasing the supply of (or attracting) capital as well as the supply of labor. Rosenberg (1972: 32–33) concludes that immigrants to the United States also brought European technology that increased the productivity of American industry.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What did the Neolithic humans living in mountain regions need to do to adapt to the landscapes

azamat

Neolithic humans living in mountain regions should get adapted to use terracing to grow crops.

Explanation:

The Neolithic culture had been in existence for about 12,000 years ago. It was said to be the final period of Stone Age. Neolithic culture is believed to be followed, when the farming started its development in Eastern part of the world.

Neolithic people used mud-brick to construct their houses. Many changes were introduced in agriculture during Neolithic period and new technologies were invented for farming. The Neolithic people changed their lifestyle from hunting and gathering to agriculture.

Neolithic humans living in mountain regions used terrace to grow crops.

3 0

3 years ago

List the reformations that Caesar made while he was in power ?? Please help me , Thanks

vfiekz [6]

Gaius Julius Caesar was perhaps one of the most influential peoples of all time. His historic rise to power and overthrow of the Roman Republic put an estimated 45 million people or around 15-25 percent of the world’s population under his control. Therefore, it is no wonder Caesar has been one of the main subjects of early history and it is also no wonder the Roman culture from 2,000 years ago can still be seen worldwide today. But with every historical event, comes questions as to why or how the event happened in the way it did. Due to Caesar’s rise to power having massive implications for so many people and history, it is necessary and rather interesting to explore how he was able to take over.

5 0

3 years ago

PLZ PLZ PLZ HELP

Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

King Leopold II treated the Congo as his personal property and exploited the country for slave labor, rubber, and ivory. The Belgian Congo was established in 1908 after the international community pressured the Belgian government to annex the country and take it out of the king's hands. Conditions in Belgian Congo improved as the Belgian government supported education and established trade. Nevertheless, the people of the Congo increased their demands for independence.

5 0

3 years ago

The powers of the U.S. President were significantly limited by the decision in United States v. Nixon, in that it rejected which

cluponka [151]

Answer:

In the United States v. Nixon decision is considered a crucial precedent limiting the power of any U.S. president to claim executive privilege.

Explanation:

The United States v. Nixon was an outcome of the watergate scandal. During the hearing of the case by the United States supreme court, the court outwardly rejected the "absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances."

This limited the power of any president in domains of executive privilege.

The executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to conduct confidential communications such that they are resistant to the judicial

6 0

3 years ago