It would be B cause he didn't act on it making it worse. hope this helps
United States steeped in Enlightenment ideals because they see it as the philosophical basis of the American Revolution, whereas in Europe the Enlightenment was largely discredited because to them it affect the social and political order.
<h3>What is
Enlightenment in United States?</h3>
The American Enlightenment can be described as the intellectual and religious freedom that took place in the America around the 19th century which can been seen as the one that brought about how the revolution of the America came to light.
And as a result of this , the new America came to light and this brought about positive effect on the people of America whereas to the Europeans the enlightenment seems to have an effect on the social and political order of the region which made them not to take it the way the Americans took it and on the other note ,the enlightenment in the United States of America brought about political change.
Learn more about Enlightenment at:
brainly.com/question/12481854
#SPJ1
Answer:
Malcolm X promoted a segregationist approach that sought to instill in blacks a pride in their African heritage, whereas Martin Luther King believed that self-respect would come through integration.
Explanation:
Lack of incentive - The lack of incentive among the colonists to complete important tasks led to the tasks not getting done. Many settlers were "gentlemanly" - Since most of the settlers considered themselves "gentlemanly", they considered the hard work of a settler "beneath" them and consequently did not get most of the basic things needed to survive done.
Expectations of finding gold - The expectations of finding gold (and mining it) led to people neglecting things such as gathering food, setting up shelter, etc. Location - The location that the settlers chose to settle in at was great for defending against naval incursions but terrible for living conditions. Bad Relations with Natives- The relations with the local Native Americans(which were all mistakenly grouped up into the Powhatan Indians) were not as good as they could be; if they had had a better relationship they could have traded for food and/or shelter which could have led to lower mortality rates
