Answer:
Hablo inglés, así que estoy usando un traductor. Esto es lo que creo que es la respuesta: por el puente de tierra que quedó después de la Edad de Hielo. Posiblemente cazando y siguiendo animales. ¡Espero que esto ayude! :)
Answer:Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was ... The Court did not ask federal marshals to carry out the decision ...
Explanation:
An exemplary aristocrat who advocated democracy, Jefferson was never comfortable associating with the common man. Marshall, who distrusted democracy, never lost the common touch. Jefferson opposed an energetic central government as a danger to individual liberty; Marshall saw the government in Washington as the keystone of national well-being. Jefferson identified with Virginia; Marshall, with the United States. Jefferson favored agriculture and advocated the virtues of rural life; Marshall, an avid farmer himself, was more attuned to the needs of commerce and industry…. In some respects the differences involved the classic tension between the man of ideas and the man of affairs. Jefferson was at his best when articulating a philosophy of government. Marshall, when applying one.
The Geneva accords are signed at the conference
I hope that's help:0
Answer:
fed. regulation of business
social reform
political reform
woman's suffrage
Explanation:
commerce act has to do with business
prohibition is people outlawing alcohol to stop people from drinking excessively
statewide primary system has to do with voting