Answer:
The correct answer is D. Those in police custody had certain rights
Explanation:
In Miranda vs Arizona, the supreme court specifically stated that if a person in custody is interrogated by the police, and does not consult with his or her lawyer about what to say druing the interrogation, then, nothing of what he or she says can be used by the prosecutor during trial.
For example, if John Smith is taken into custody, and does not have the legal knowledge to ask for lawyer to provide him with legal advice before interrogation, nothing of what he says to the police can be used by prosecutor Robert Robertson in order to incriminate him during trial.
Answer: C
Explanation: In 1886, the Supreme Court ruled in Wabash v. Illinois that the state of Illinois could not regulate the rates that the Wabash Railroad was charging as its freight traffic was Interstate. It emphasized that only the federal government, through Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce.
This case overturned the earlier Munn vs. Illinois case, whereby states had the power to regulate businesses dealing with interstate commerce.
The Wabash decision led to the creation of the Interstate Commerce Commission in 1887; this was the first modern regulatory agency of its kind.
He didn’t make one promises which was he was gonna make country happy
<em>The system of Roman government, had a social organization which covered from the natives to the slaves and foreigners, nevertheless by means of the edict of Carcalla in the year 202, the citizenship was granted even to the conquered towns, this reform made the Emperor Carcalla, with the purpose of everyone paying their taxes.</em>
Answer:
a lot of money that are spshel