Answer:
Pygmalion effect
Explanation:
Pygmalion effect is the psychological process in which the expectation related to work improves the performance of a person. George Bernard Shaw was a social psychologist who proposed the Pygmalion effect.
Many psychologists conducted much research on the Pygmalion effect. Rosenthal was a psychologist who has been used this affect students' classroom where it has been called a classroom Pygmalion effect.
Thus here Sarah a middle-class school teacher who has been used Pygmalion effect in her classroom to improve the performance of the students.
Answer:
New and legal, just and equal or godly and fair.
Explanation:
A newspaper office runs smoothly because each employee has a specific job that leads to newspapers being printed and distributed. emile durkheim would call this organic solidarity.
Organic solidarity is based on the premise that individuals can collectively mix and live together in society. It is contrasted by mechanical solidarity, which often refers to pre-industrialized social settings, whereby communities were mostly isolated and had homogeneous social traits.
Émile Durkheim's Organic Solidarity is a theory that explains how we work together, we divide work and how this causes us to depend on each other. An example is when in a school sale some are responsible for making the product, perhaps cupcakes, others to buy the ingredients to make them, other students sell them and others charge them. To do the job completely, we must depend on others and work in solidarity.
Learn more about Émile Durkheim:
brainly.com/question/5131392
#SPJ4
Answer:
65
Explanation:
An autosomal dominant condition is one where one copy of the allele is sufficient to cause the condition. Penetrance refers to the degree to which that mutation causes the phenotype
Lets say the allele for sharp beak is S and for normal beak is s. If 2 heterozygous sharp-beaked terrapins mate, the cross is the following:
Ss x Ss
<u> S s </u>
S SS Ss
s Ss ss
The possible genotypes are SS, Ss and ss. 50% of their offspring will be heterozygous, and 25% homozygous each. Therefore, if the mutation was fully penetrant, it would be 75 out of 100 offspring would be affected.
However, the mutation is only 87% penetrant, which means only 87% of those 75 offspring would have the condition.
87% of 75 = 65.25
Therefore, we would expect 65 of their offspring to have sharp beaks
