1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
3 years ago
15

Why did britain impose the stamp act and the townshend acts on the colonists?

History
1 answer:
TiliK225 [7]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is B. <span>Britain needed money.
Because of the French Indian war, Britain lost a lot of resources even though the war is still on going.
Due to the urgency of their situation, Britain imposed stamp act to increase the tax of American colonists and increases The income of British government.</span>
You might be interested in
What is the right of
Gekata [30.6K]
1. The right is if the government is making you do unjust things and abuse their power u have the right to say no
2. Yes, the whiskey rebellion, rebellion against the townshed acts
3. They both rebelled against the government for making laws they didn’t approve of, they stop buying the products and protest
3 0
3 years ago
What request does cherry make to pony boy ?
allsm [11]
Keep being the same way you are
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In at least 150 words evaluate the effectiveness of the presidential election process in the United States
larisa86 [58]

Every 4 years, the corresponding Tuesday between November 2 and 8, and after almost a year of campaigning, US citizens are ready to vote for their candidates for president. A short time later, in the month of December, the president and vice president of the United States are elected by the vote of only 538 citizens called "electors" of the Electoral College.

The president of the United States is elected in an assembly formed by 538 voters. This figure is equal to the sum of 100 senators + 435 congressmen + 3 delegates from Washington D.C., who does not have senators but delegates. Each state contributes with a block of these delegates, whose number is equal to the sum of their representatives plus their senators or delegates.

On the ballot papers, each candidate for president has the name of their vice president and the political party to which they belong. But these votes do not elect the president for the moment, but rather they choose en bloc the delegates of this political option who will go to the electoral college later. As there are 538 delegates in total, a candidate needs at least 270 to be elected. Which translates into half of those 538 or 269 + 1 = 270 delegates to be elected President of the United States.

When a citizen votes for his or her candidate for president, this person is actually voting to instruct the elector of his or her state where his or her vote should be directed in the Electoral College. For example, if a citizen deposits his ballot for the candidate of the Republican party, this person is really ordering the "elector" of his state to vote for that candidate at the meeting of voters in the electoral college, the same in the Democratic case. Or what is the same, whoever wins the popular vote in a certain state, will get the support of "the electors" and, therefore, the state votes to that candidate and his party.

If it happens that none of the candidates get more than 269 electoral votes, the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution comes into force and Congress decides who will be the new president. The combination of congressmen from each state is entitled to one vote per state and a simple majority of states gives one winner. This situation has occurred twice in American history. The first occurred in 1801: Thomas Jefferson was elected president; the second occurred in 1825, when President John Quincy Adams was elected.

Critics of the electoral voting system emphasize the fact that a candidate for president, still losing popular elections, can obtain 270 votes and, therefore, become president by the Electoral College.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the political machines such as tammy hall work with and for immigrants
ad-work [718]

"They promised bills and laws in favor of immigrants in exchange for votes" is the one way among the following choices given in the question that political machines, such as Tammany Hall, work with and for immigrants.



4 0
3 years ago
After britain issued the intolerable acts, colonists punished anyone supporting british policies or officials by
Yuliya22 [10]
Ye the British ,, could also
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the leader of soviet union during cold war?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the power held by the federal government after the civil war?
    9·1 answer
  • What is one reason why the government would provide financial assistance to an entrepreneur?
    15·2 answers
  • What is one way the East India Company asserted its authority in India
    10·2 answers
  • During the drafting of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, early Americans debated how much power states and the federal go
    8·1 answer
  • Who said "I and my companions suffer from a disease of the heart which can be cured only by gold ​
    7·2 answers
  • What is the paradox for voting? What are some of the costs and benefits of voting?
    8·1 answer
  • In a monarchy, when supreme power rests in a constitution, it is referred to as a(n) __________.
    7·1 answer
  • Which Supreme Courts case resulted in recognizing that a symbolic act is within the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?
    7·2 answers
  • 100 POINTSS!! How did the end of ​ World War II ​ impact the United States and its involvement in Europe?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!