The way Holmes handles the perpetrators of the crimes affect how I view Holmes in a significant way: these examples show that, even with all the characteristics that put Holmes one step ahead of most human being, he is somehow still human, human enough to do something that is not considered right for many, but for him it is. It showed me that Holmes has an integrity I never considered before.
----
For me, it is, as it proves his integrity and also the dedication to his work. He does not want to punish the guilty, instead what really concerns Holmes is the discovery of the truth. In that sense, his mission is admirable.
----
Yes, it is possible to say that he sees himself as “above the law”. Holmes does not care for trivial human conventions, as he displayed on many occasions throughout his career. He believes that his ability and talent are enough to put him above the law.
----
It depends on what it is considered ethical. From his point of view, surely it is ethical. From the point of view of the justice system, it is surely not ethical. From a personal perspective, while I do understand his point of view, I do not consider his behavior ethical.
----
<span>I do consider his behavior ethical because, while he has many talents and abilities, no man should be seen himself as above the law. It takes only one man to consider himself as so to justify every other man to do the same, and so this would led to many men thinking they could do justice on their own. </span>
Answer:
ack :C I totally would but I'm doing school annd I cant talk during the week T^T bc im at myy Moms not dads :CCCCC
Explanation:
the answer is Surja becomes jealous because she fears her husband will put her aside to marry the younger woman
Answer:
Nadia Arumugam will completely agree with this cartoon because she clearly stated that 'no one is completely banned from taking unlimited amounts of soda since they are not restricted from ordering two or more bottles of soda if they so desire'.
Explanation:
In the cartoon the picture of a man drinking a giant-sized soda before the ban, was compared to him after the ban buying two cans of soda. There was clearly no difference between the two because the objective of the ban which was to reduce obesity was defeated. The man remained obese.
This is in line with Nadia's argument that the ban does not prevent anyone from drinking an unlimited amount of soda since they could simply buy two or more cans if they so desire.
Answer:
B. the ability to construct tall buildings has increased greatly over time
Explanation:
In the article, Marvels of the Modern World, the author under the section "How High Can We Go?" gives a brief rundown from the first tallest building in the world to the current tallest building in the world. According to her, the first tallest building in the world was the Empire State building completed in 1931 in the United States. This was followed by the twin towers, the World Trade Center, the Sears Towers, the Petronas Towers, the Tapei 101, and today the Burj Khalifa in Dubai.
As time progressed, the author noted that better designs have evolved to aid the construction of these buildings.