They all were controlled by Spain
<span>Lincoln was the tool to reconnect the North and South of the US, there was a ten percent plan for the south in order for them to be allowed back in the Union once ten percent of their legal voters swore their allegiance to the US, Johnson was a firm believer that African Americans held no place in reconstruction and that he granted free hand as well as local affairs, and finally the North decided to turn on Johnson because of how he chose to deal with the southern states government.</span>
Answer:
While African resistance to European colonialism is often thought of in terms of a white and black/European and African power struggle, this presumption underestimates the complex and strategic thinking that Africans commonly employed to address the challenges of European colonial rule. It also neglects the colonial-era power dynamic of which African societies and institutions were essential components.
After the Berlin Conference of 1884–85, at which the most powerful European countries agreed upon rules for laying claim to particular African territories, the British, French, Germans, Italians, Spanish, Belgians, and Portuguese set about formally implementing strategies for the long-term occupation and control of Africa. The conquest had begun decades earlier—and in the case of Angola and South Africa, centuries earlier. But after the Berlin Conference it became more systematic and overt.
The success of the European conquest and the nature of African resistance must be seen in light of Western Europe's long history of colonial rule and economic exploitation around the world. In fact, by 1885 Western Europeans had mastered the art of divide, conquer, and rule, honing their skills over four hundred years of imperialism and exploitation in the Americas, Asia, and the Pacific. In addition, the centuries of extremely violent, protracted warfare among themselves, combined with the technological advances of the Industrial Revolution, produced unmatched military might. When, rather late in the period of European colonial expansion, Europeans turned to Africa to satisfy their greed for resources, prestige, and empire, they quickly worked their way into African societies to gain allies and proxies, and to co-opt the conquered kings and chiefs, all to further their exploits. Consequently, the African responses to this process, particularly the ways in which they resisted it, were complex.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, the use of silver Spanish dollars extended from the Spanish territories in the Americas westwards to Asia and eastwards to Europe, forming the first worldwide currency
Slavery among Native Americans in the United States<span> includes slavery </span>by<span> Native Americans as well as slavery </span>of<span> Native Americans roughly within the present-day United States. Tribal territories and the slave trade ranged over present-day borders. Some </span>Native American tribes<span> held war captives as slaves prior to and during </span>European colonization<span>, some Native Americans were captured and sold by others into slavery to Europeans, and a small number of tribes, in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, adopted the practice of holding slaves as </span>chattel<span> property and held increasing numbers of </span>African-American<span> slaves.</span>
