The name of the fallacy with the statement "The Gorps would have you believe that all you need to be happy is green beans, but those of us with heads on our shoulders know better'' is <em>argumentum ad lapidem </em>or appeal to the stone. This is the answer because the speaker is implying that the argument of Gorps is absurd but he is not providing any information or evidence that it's absurd. His only evidence is that 'those among us with heads on ours shoulders know better' and that's it.
Answer:
-9
Explanation:
Just like how 9*9 is 81, -9* -9 is also 81
A negative times a negative equals a positive
Hope this helps
Answer:
Here are instead of is.
Explanation:
Here is the directions to my house From Jefferson Avenue turn right onto Seminary Road Go straight for one half mile Then take another right onto Marisa Street The third house on the left is mine.
Answer:
"You are going near the post office?" Mrs. Reid asked her husband.
"Yes," he said. "Is there anything you want?"
"Could you get me a small registered envelope, please?" Mrs. Reid said, "I've got to send some money to my sister in Guyana."
"Ok," Mr. Reid said. "I'll get a Coulee. It may be useful to have a spare one available."
Explanation:
There are many ways that this paragraph could be punctuated. However, in my interpretation, I used commas to integrate my quotation marks, etc.
For example:
"Ok," Mr. Reid said. "I'll get a Coulee. It may be useful to have a spare one available."
I decided to add a period to the end of "said." However, you could choose to do it differently. For example, you could choose to write it like this:
"Ok," Mr. Reid said, "I'll get a Coulee. It may be useful to have a spare one available."
(Notice how I replaced the period with a comma? That simply means that "Ok and "I'll get a Coulee" is all one sentence versus two sentences. Both versions are grammatically correct. The writer simply needs to choose which one s/he wants.)
