Answer:
6
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: FALSE
Actually, the answer to this question depends on whether the clause is reversed or not.
Since we are not told whether the the clause is reversed or not. It is safe to assume that it was retained (i.e. not reversed). So the answer to this question is FALSE because if one takes a true "if-then" statement, inserted a 'not' in each clause, and retained the clauses, the new statement would NOT be true.
On the contrary, if the clause is reversed, the answer would be TRUE, because if one takes a true "if-then" statement, inserted a not in each clause, and reversed the clauses, the new statement would also be true.
Answer:(-8,-4)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
c) 2(2y+1)
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because when the tables are together there can be 4 people at each table, plus 1 at either end. Whatever equation you have must have +2 in it, to account for the ends of the tables. The number of tables (y) must be multiplied by 4 because there are always 4 people per table. The number of tables is unknown so 4y must be in your equation.
2(2y+1) simplifies to 4y+2, which is the equation we want.
