1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
3 years ago
6

Consider two single-malt whiskey distillers, Laphroaig and Knockando. If they advertise, they can both sell more whiskey and inc

rease their revenue. However, the cost of advertising more than offsets the increased revenue so that each distiller ends up with a lower profit than if they do not advertise. On the other hand, if only one advertises, that distiller increases its market share and also its profit.
a. Construct a payoff matrix using the following hypothetical information: If neither distiller advertises, each earns a profit of $35 million per year. If both advertise, each earns a profit of $20 million per year. If one advertises and the other does not, the distiller who advertises earns a profit of $50 million and the distiller who does not advertise earns a profit of $9 million.
b. If Laphroaig wants to maximize profit, will it advertise? Briefly explain.
c. If Knockando wants to maximize profit, will it advertise? Briefly explain.
d. Is there a dominant strategy for each distiller? Briefly explain.
Business
1 answer:
Zarrin [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a)                                 Advertising               Not advertising

Advertising   $20 million, $20 million  $50 million, $9  million

Not Advertising  $9 million, $50 million       $35 million, $35 million

b)  If Laphroaig wants to maximize profit, it will advertise only when Knockando does not advertise.

c)  If Knockando wants to maximize profit, it will advertise only when Laphroaig does not advertise.

e) No, there is no dominant strategy for each distiller.

Explanation:

a)  A payoff matrix is a visual representation of all the possible strategies and all of the possible outcomes. Below is the payoff matrix for the distillers:

                         Advertising               Not advertising

Advertising   $20 million, $20 million  $50 million, $9  million

Not Advertising  $9 million, $50 million       $35 million, $35 million

b) If Knockando does not advertise then Laphroaig gets $50 millions of profit if Laphroaig advertises. If Knockando does not advertise and Laphroaig does not advertise then Laphroaig will get only $35 million. If both do advertise, they both get $20 million.  If Knockando does advertise and Laphroaig does not advertise then Laphroaig earns a profit of $9 million.  If Laphroaig wants to maximize profit, it will advertise only when Knockando does not advertise.

c)  Same conditions as in b) Therefore, If Knockando wants to maximize profit, it will advertise only when Laphroaig does not advertise.  

d) No, there is no dominant strategy for each distiller. If the two distillers agree to coordinate their strategy means both of them can decide not to advertise to earn a profit of $35 million per year each which is better than when both advertise.

You might be interested in
Where a hirer exercises his option to purchase the goods; he must tender to the owner
Rudiy27

Hello, Don't worry! I will try to answer as best as I can and as fast as I can. Sorry if I am wrong. I am still learning. Hope you get this correct.

The perfect tender principle is the right of the consumer that says that goods that are bought must conform to the product description in quantity,quality and usage.It must also be delivered at an agreed time between the buyer and seller.If the goods fail to meet this requirement,the buyer has the legal right to reject the goods.

Hope this helps you!

:).

8 0
2 years ago
A manager who wants control over decisions and expects employees to obey is what type of manager
AfilCa [17]
The answer is b or a but I mean it both means the same thing, if this is on Plato it's a
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Access Organics, Inc., hired Andy Hernandez to sell organic produce. Later, Hernandez signed an agreement not to compete with Ac
MariettaO [177]

Answer: The Non Compete is NOT Enforceable.

Explanation:

An Agreement not to compete with your previous company is a RESTRICTIVE covenant that was generally introduced to ensure that Upper and Middle Management who were generally privy to Trade Secrets in an Organization do not take that information somewhere else and use it against that old company usually in exchange for better compensation packages.

Hernandez joined Access Organics and regrettably was not given a pay increase or any other special considerations. This is very relevant.

For a Non-compete to hold relevance especially if it is signed AFTER an employee has already being working in an organization, there needs to be SUFFICIENT Considerations that gave the employee better terms such as more job security or better benefits as a result of signing said agreement.

Andy Hernandez received no such benefits in return for signing the agreement and so the Non-compete Agreement lacks said Sufficient Considerations.

The Non-compete is therefore NOT ENFORCEABLE.

It is worthy of note that in the actual case, the Judge ruled in favor of of Andy Hernandez.

If you require further clarification do react or comment.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
g In translating the financial statements of a foreign subsidiary into the parent’s reporting currency under the current rate me
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

The translation adjustment is a function of the foreign subsidiary's net assets.

3 0
3 years ago
On May 1, Shilling Company sold merchandise in the amount of $5,800 to Anders, with credit terms of 2/10, n/30. The cost of the
Arada [10]

Answer:

The correct answer is:

Debit: Account receivable $5,800

Credit: Sales revenue $5,800

Debit: Cost of goods sold $4,000

Credit: Merchandise inventory $4,000

Explanation:

On 1st May

Upon sale of inventory on credit

Debit: Account receivable $5,800

Credit: Sales revenue $5,800

On 1st May

To record cost of goods sold of merchandise inventory:

Debit: Cost of goods sold $4,000

Credit: Merchandise inventory $4,000

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Quizlit A $1,000 bond quote in the business press reports Coupon (%) of 3.45, Maturity of 2024, Current ($) of 1,012.90 and Yiel
    13·1 answer
  • Business managers are often overly confident of their own hiring ability because they are more likely to monitor the successes o
    15·1 answer
  • There are a number of toothpastes marketed under the Crest brand, including Cavity Protection Crest, Pro-Health Sensitive Shield
    15·1 answer
  • Dorothy Taylor has won a state lottery and will receive a payment of $93,000 every year, starting today, for the next 20 years.
    7·2 answers
  • Sheffield Corp. assigned $1601000 of accounts receivable to Pharoah Company as security for a loan of $1344000. Pharoah charged
    7·1 answer
  • Highly Suspect Corp. has current liabilities of $450,000, a quick ratio of .89, inventory turnover of 6.5, and a current ratio o
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Crane Chemicals Company acquires a delivery truck at a cost of $31,400 on January 1, 2022. The truck is expected to have a sa
    12·1 answer
  • A treatment plant has three primary clarifiers at 60 ft in diameter with side water depths of 9 ft. The inboard weirs are set at
    15·1 answer
  • How is it different to approach someone with good news versus bad news? Answer in a few short sentences.
    12·2 answers
  • C. this year casey made a gift worth $16.8 million to stephanie. casey is married to helen in a common-law state, and the 2010 g
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!