The correct answer is Simple
Explanation:
The sentence "Australia's rain forests are located in the northeast" is composed of a subject "Australia's rain forests" and a predicate "are located in the northeast" (verb and other details that complete an idea). This means this sentence only contains one clause (subject-verb/predicate unit) and due to this, it is classified as a simple sentence. Indeed, compound or complex sentences should contain two or more clauses but in simple sentences, there is only one clause or grammatical unit that is complete and expresses an idea.
Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
The authors perspective he feels that the storm is not damaging, that the winds are soft to him, I don't think the forest needs the storm because the wind can destroy the trees. Muir feels that the wind and the storm together make beautiful sounds.The author feels the love of the wind, how it caresses the trees, stimulates their growth and develops their strength and beauty. He KNOWS trees--all their names, how their needles are different, and how each species even smells different.
mark me as the brainliest
Main idea is the central idea there the same thing hope that helps
Answer:
I didnot understand this question you have asked, please right it correctly what to explain.
thankyou....
