1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad [161]
3 years ago
10

What was the essence of thurgood marshall's argument in the supreme court in brown vs. the board of education?

History
1 answer:
Nostrana [21]3 years ago
4 0
Thurgood Marshall's arguments in the Supreme Court case Brown vs. Board argued that segregated schools violate the Equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. Along with this, Marshall argues that the doctrine of "separate but equal", established in the Supreme Court case Plessy vs. Ferguson, has resulted in severe inequality in American society for African-American citizens. He uses examples of different times when African-Americans and whites interact in American society without a problem as a means to strengthen his argument as to why school segregation should end.
You might be interested in
Which statement best describes how Hebrew beliefs developed? A. Hebrew beliefs were a reflection of what the Hebrews learned fro
Gemiola [76]
The statement that best describes how Hebrew beliefs developed is Hebrew beliefs were all revealed in the Torah from the beginning. The correct answer is C. 
6 0
3 years ago
Why did the war affect the loyalists
vladimir1956 [14]
<span>Thousands lost their property. Between 60,000-100,000 Loyalist left the US during and after the war they moved to Canada.

*Hope this helps</span>
5 0
3 years ago
30 points please help!
prohojiy [21]
The bold, triumphant stance highlights the significance of the the brilliant tactical move that Washington and his army were about to undertake. The surprise attack on the Hessian garrison at Trenton resulted in an important victory and a morale boost for the colonial troops.
5 0
3 years ago
What was sanfords argument in the Scott vs Sanford case
Radda [10]
In Dred Scott v<span>. </span>Sandford<span> the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.

Hope I could help :)

</span>
4 0
3 years ago
. Henry Court and Henry Bessemer both worked in what industry?
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer: Hewo, there! Your answer is Below

Steel Is the industry Henry Court and Henry Bessemer both worked in

Explanation:The Bessemer process was the first inexpensive industrial process for the mass production of steel from molten pig iron before the development of the open hearth furnace. The key principle is removal of impurities from the iron by oxidation with air being blown through the molten iron.

Hope this helps you!!

Havea great day!!!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1.5 BYA, what was the name of the super continent and how did it form?
    14·1 answer
  • What three challenges faced the Guomindang in the 1930s?
    7·2 answers
  • Congress can fix the standard for what and measures
    14·1 answer
  • What were the british doing when they got attacked at lexington
    7·1 answer
  • What did reformers believe about people
    5·1 answer
  • Control by one country over another country’s government, trade, and culture is called?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was Nelson Mandela suspended from the University of Fort Hare? ​
    11·2 answers
  • 1. What did Booth hope to
    8·1 answer
  • Plzzzz help meeeeee get pzzzzz
    6·1 answer
  • The Bill of Rights ensures that all U.S. citizens:
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!