Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: Relational switching cost.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept known as <em>''switching cost'' </em>in the field of business, basically refers to all the costs involved in the procedure of switching from a supplier to a new one. Moreover, this term also involves many different types, such as financial switching costs, procedural switching costs and relational switching costs.
To continue, the third one, <em>the relational switching cost</em> refers to the situation where a company has changed its supplier and a big loss of identification and emotional bonds changed as well with it. Furthermore, when relational switching costs take place the personal relationships between the people involved in the transactions of the company are lost and that generates an impact in the new relationships with the new supplier.
Answer:
Yes, you can be confident that the portfolio will not lose more than 30% of its value next year
Explanation:
In this question , the average return of portfolio is 12.5% and the standard deviation is 19.5%. It is estimated that there will be 30% loss next year. The confidence interval is 95%.
Range = Average return ± 2 x Standard deviation Low aid = 12.5% - (2 x19.5%) =12.5% -39% = -26.5%
High end = 12.5% +(2 x19.5%) =12.5%+39% = 51.5%
Thus, the low end is
26.5%
The range of return at 95% confidence interval is -26.5% to 51.5%
Answer:
D) Use production technologies that conserve on the number of workers.
Explanation:
Answer:
d. INTC: 2.36 TXN: 3.43
Explanation:
The property , plant equipment turnover is the ratio of sales divided by the amount of PPE as shown below:
PPE turnover=sales/(beginning PPE+ending PPE)/2
Intel Corporation (INTC):
PPE turnover=$38,826/($15,768+$17,111)/2
PPE turnover=$38,826/$16,439.50
PPE turnover=2.36 times
Texas Instruments (TXN):
PPE turnover=$13,392/( $3,918+$3,899)/2
PPE turnover=$13,392/$3,908.50
PPE turnover=3.43 times
The correct option is D
I believe the answer is b
