Answer:
e. under-applied by $4,000
Explanation:
The overhead rate was calcualte considering labor cost:
144,000 / 240,000 = 0.60
Each dollar of labor cost applies 60 cent of overhead
applied overhead:
$220,000 labor cost x 0-60 each = 132,000 applied overhead
now we compare against the 136,000 actual overhead
as we didn't met the value and fell short, we have underapplied the overhead.
The discounted payback period for the project is 2.33 years.
Time Cashflow PVF at 8% Present value Cumulative Present value
0 -$100 1 -100 -100
1 40 0.925926 37.03704 -62.963
<u><em>2 50 0.857339 42.86694 -20.096</em></u>
3 60 0.793832 47.62993 27.53391
<u>Note</u>
- The PVF for each year are derived using the PVF calculator (i.e PVF, 8%, 0 years)
- We can also observe that we are able to payback the money before the entire 3rd year, therefore, the 2nd year will be used in calculation of discounted payback period.
Discounted payback period = 2 Years + 20.096/47.6299
Discounted payback period = 2 Years + 0.33
Discounted payback period = 2.33 years.
Therefore, the discounted payback period for the project is 2.33 years.
Missing word includes <em>"Compute the discounted payback period for a project with the following cash flows received uniformly within each year and with a required return of 8%: Initial Outlay = $100 Cash Flows: Year 1 = $40 Year 2 = $50 Year 3 = $60"</em>
See similar solution here
<em>brainly.com/question/13247540</em>
In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice
Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.
According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.
In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is D. For general obligation bonds, the source of income backing the issue.
Explanation:
There is no requirement to disclose the source of income that supports a general obligation issue because it must be a taxing power. The MSRB requires that the type of income that supports an income bond issue be disclosed, as well as the name of the corporate guarantor of the industrial income bonds. The dates of the calls "in their entirety" must also be disclosed in the customer confirmations, as they may affect the price of the issuance according to the rules of the MSRB (the MSRB requires that if a bond quoted based on performance is negotiated with a premium, and if it is enforceable "in its entirety" on pre-established dates and prices, then the dollar price must be calculated at the date of the call instead of the expiration date, since it is most likely to be called ).
Answer:
A. waste management
Explanation:
option A is the correct answer
Mark me as Brainliest
