Answer:
The Nixon Doctrine was one of many attempts by the president to encourage “<em>Vietnamization</em>” or withdrawing US soldiers and turning over defense duties to the South Vietnamese troops.
Explanation:
The expression <em>Vietnamization</em> in the context of the US withdrawing its forces from the Vietnam War means that Americans were leaving the territory so the conflict between North and South Vietnam would be handled by themselves.
President Richard Nixon issued a statement in 1969 where he announced that the US had been talking with South Vietnam leaders and American troops were going to be substituted by southvietnamese troops in the areas of the conflict. By this time American pacifists and veterans groups were massively protesting against the continuous presence of the US in the war.
During the late 1800s in Poland and Russia, anti-Semitism took the form of violent attacks called Pogrom.
These attacks forced many Jews to flee to western Europe. Nonetheless, some Jews continued to survive in eastern Europe in small villages called Shtetlekh.
Pogrom is a Russian word which means to wreak havoc or to demolish violently. Historically, the term refers to violent attacks by local non-Jewish populations on Jews in the Russian Empire and in other countries.
Shtetlekh were small towns with large Jewish populations, which existed in Central and Eastern Europe before the Holocaust.
What Justice Brown says about a law that implies "merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races is that the distinction will continues though , there is no eradicate legal equality.
<h3>How did
Justice Brown legal distinction between the white and
colored races?</h3>
Justice Brown perceive this as something that will not stop so far there is distinguishing of the white from the other race .
However , he came to conclusion that this does not have tendency to bring destruction to legal equality of the races.
learn more about Justice Brown at brainly.com/question/24812344
#SPJ1
Answer:
He said he would make California a great state.
Explanation:
All leaders would say that.
Answer:
The causes of imperialism can be attributed to a ruler's self interest for the access of certain materials or land that can be beneficial to their country or empire. The justificiation of imperialism could be to improve the conditions of a impoverished country or to secure the access of materials that can be beneficial to those who use imperliams. The effects of imperliasm can be the division and destruction of native cultures, forced assimilation which leads to customs to be forgotten, and the looting of resources which can leave the native populations economically destroyed.
Explanation:
