Answer:
D. lower per unit cost of items produced on the line.
Explanation:
"The primary benefit of assembly lines is that they allow workers and machines to specialize at performing specific tasks, which can increase productivity. Large-scale assembly lines can allow for mass production of goods that would not be possible if products were made from start to finish by a single worker. The high productivity of mass production can also result in lower cost per unit produced than other manufacturing methods."
Reference: Hamel, Gregory. “Pros & Cons of Manufacturing Products With Assembly Lines.” Small Business - Chron.com, Chron.com, 21 Nov. 2017
Answer:
The portfolio rate of return is 14%
Explanation:
The portfolio's rate of return is the weighted average of the expected rate of return =s of the individual stocks that form up the portfolio. Thus the formula for rate of return of a portfolio is,
Portfolio rate of return = wA * rA + wB * rB
Where,
- wA is the weight of security A in the portfolio
- wB is the weight of Security B in the portfolio
- rA is the rate of return of Stock A
- rB is the rate of return of Stock B
So, the portfolio return is,
rP or Portfolio return = 0.5 * 0.1 + 0.5 * 0.18
rP = 0.14 or 14%
1. Prior to the arrival of Alan Mullay, Ford was following a
strategy of offering products that were modified as per the tastes and
preferences of the local market. It did not pusrue a strategy of standardization.
For Ford, the focus was to meet the particular demands of local consumers. The
benefits of this strategy was that particular tastes and preferences of loacl
consumers were satisfied by producing models with different specifications for
different markets. For
example, Americans love SUVs and trucks while Asian and European
consumers have a preference for fuel efficient cars. This strategy helps Ford
to cater to all the different needs.
In terms of costs, such a stratgey increased the production and
operations costs as the economies of scale could bot be achieved. Further
advantages of standardization like common parts, sharing of development costs
could not have been reaped by Ford, thus increasing costs. Ford was pursuing this strategy due to the autonomy of different regions within Ford's organization.
<span>2. With the One Ford initiative, Mullay is trying to create car
platforms that can be used accross the globe without any need for modifications
and customizations. The benefits of this strategy is that development costs
will be shared among different markets, common parts can be procured for a car
model and eventually economies of scale can be achieved. For example, small cars like</span> Focus will have
the same set of requirements accross the globe and can be standardized easily. In terms of drawbacks, Ford will not be able to cater to regional
nuances in the taste of customers belonging to different markets.
<span>3. The One Ford initiative does not imply that Ford will now disregard
national and regional differences in demand. It will merely cut down the number
of platforms that stands at 15 currently to around five platforms. Minor
modifications will be allowed under the platform and these minor modifications
will ensure that national and regional differences in demand is satisfied. This
is specially the case for smaller cars like Focus, or the Escape
SUV.</span>
<span> </span>
Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
Taking the highest and second lowest cost and miles driven as:
Cost = Highest - Lowest
Cost = $15,000 - $14,150
Cost = $850
Miles Driven = Highest - Lowest
Miles driven = 8,500 - 8,000
Miles Driven = 500
So,
= Cost / Miles driven
= $850 / 500
= $1.70
Total Cost would be 15,000 and 13,500
So, computing the variable cost as:
Variable cost of highest cost (VC) = Miles driven of $15,000 cost × $1.70
VC = 8,500× $1.70
VC = $14,450
Variable cost of lowest cost (VC) = Miles driven of $13,500 cost × $1.70
VC = 7,500× $1.70
VC = $12,750
Computing fixed cost as:
Fixed cost of highest cost = Total cost - VC
= $15,000 - $14,450
= $550
Fixed cost of lowest cost = Total cost - VC
= $13,500 - $12,750
= $750
Answer:
c) $18,986
Explanation:
The computation of the payment of principal is shown below:
= Annual payment - (Balance of Principal × interest rate)
= $48,986 - ($250,000 × 12%)
= $48,986 - $30,000
= $18,986
We do not consider the time period. Hence, we ignored it as it is not relevant for the computation part.
We simply multiply the principal balance with the interest rate and then deduct it from the annual payment.
