Equation.
This word may fit your definition of a set of values or numbers –intergers-
coupled with basic operations. Equation is mathematical form of body where
there are two adjacent corners which aims as the word says, equation. Take for
instance in illustration 2x + 5x = 7x. This “equation” is composed of these
numbers with unknowns and the operation of addition with them. When you have
solved for 7x in the example, it only shows that to attain “equation”, solution
is performed and done. Hence, these two works relationally.
Answer:
![r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Cfrac%7Bn%28%5Csum%20xy%29-%28%5Csum%20x%29%28%5Csum%20y%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Bn%5Csum%20x%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20x%29%5E2%5D%5Bn%5Csum%20y%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20y%29%5E2%5D%7D%7D)
The value of r is always between 
And we have another measure related to the correlation coefficient called the R square and this value measures the % of variance explained between the two variables of interest, and for this case we have:

So then the best conclusion for this case would be:
c. the fraction of variation in weights explained by the least-squares regression line of weight on height is 0.64.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we know that the correlation between the height and weight of children aged 6 to 9 is found to be about r = 0.8. And we know that we use the height x of a child to predict the weight y of the child
We need to rememeber that the correlation is a measure of dispersion of the data and is given by this formula:
![r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Cfrac%7Bn%28%5Csum%20xy%29-%28%5Csum%20x%29%28%5Csum%20y%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Bn%5Csum%20x%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20x%29%5E2%5D%5Bn%5Csum%20y%5E2%20-%28%5Csum%20y%29%5E2%5D%7D%7D)
The value of r is always between 
And we have another measure related to the correlation coefficient called the R square and this value measures the % of variance explained between the two variables of interest, and for this case we have:

So then the best conclusion for this case would be:
c. the fraction of variation in weights explained by the least-squares regression line of weight on height is 0.64.
Subsitute 9 for y
9=y=9x-9
add 9 to both sides
9+9=9x+9-9
18=9x+0
18=9x
divide by 9
2=x
y=9
x=2
Answer:
15 per hour
Step-by-step explanation:
120 people / 8 hours = 15 peeps per hour!
I hope this helps you
22x