The white success in North America meant Native American poverty because the success is characterized by exploitation of the people of Native American for the British government.
<h3>What led to
white success in North America
?</h3>
The European seeks for exploitation of farm produce, tax etc in the North America and this created on burden on the Native American because they were not well developed then.
The action of the British colonization led to the event of American Revolution by the Colonist.
Read more about American Revolution
<em>brainly.com/question/674838</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
Douglass developed a passion early on for reading, a passion which, ironically, was provoked by the debased ideas of his master, Hugh Auld.
Explanation:
Answer:
they where at difrent times in history
The statement that does not describe the legacy of Arkansan Susan Hampton Newton Pryor is <u>D. She established</u> a fund to provide help to the needy.
<h3>What is a legacy?</h3>
The legacy of a person describes the person's impact and achievements or accomplishments.
For Arkansan Susan Hampton Newton Pryor, she was a known community leader and activities, supported her son, Governor David Pryor, and became the first female clerk of Ouachita Country.
Thus, the statement that does not describe the legacy of Arkansan Susan Hampton Newton Pryor is D. She established a fund to provide help to the needy.
Learn more about personal legacy at brainly.com/question/4839472
#SPJ1
The correct answer is: D. They believed that representatives were better able to vote on national issues than ordinary citizens were.
Explanation
The excerpt contrasts ancient democracies, that were characterized by tyranny and run by mobs, to the idea of a large government representation so as to demostrate that whenevever a group of people is assembled, no matter who is in it, they tend to make the wrong decisions, that is, decisions led by passion instead of reason as stated in the excerpt:
"<em>passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason".</em>
Moreover, Federalists wanted a strong national government, instead of granting the power to the states, and believed that only one person could represent 30.000 people.
